Posted on April 24, 2014 | 2 Comments
Time perhaps for a brief report on the demonstration staged by the Land Workers’ Alliance outside the DEFRA offices in Westminster’s corridors of power last week.
My colleagues in the LWA did a fine job assembling a generous farmer’s market stall of small farm produce adjacent to DEFRA’s imposing front door, much to the bemusement of its besuited denizens as they scurried out for their lunch breaks. It’s a bad time of year for us veg growers to be trying to demonstrate our productivity (rhubarb and salads featured prominently…) but all in all it was an impressive display. And some of the DEFRA employees even deigned to take one of our leaflets.
 An excellent giant effigy of Secretary of State Owen Paterson was also produced, and one of the highlights of the day was the Effigy of State’s enthusiastic liaison with a corporate agribusiness doppelganger orchestrated by my colleagues (pictured). Entertaining, I thought, though perhaps stretching the point a little. But it seems that Mr Paterson has indeed been holding secret trysts with the GMO crowd, and doesn’t want anyone to know about it. Just goes to show how bang on trend the LWA is.
An excellent giant effigy of Secretary of State Owen Paterson was also produced, and one of the highlights of the day was the Effigy of State’s enthusiastic liaison with a corporate agribusiness doppelganger orchestrated by my colleagues (pictured). Entertaining, I thought, though perhaps stretching the point a little. But it seems that Mr Paterson has indeed been holding secret trysts with the GMO crowd, and doesn’t want anyone to know about it. Just goes to show how bang on trend the LWA is.
Though regrettably DEFRA wouldn’t entertain any direct engagement with us, the demo has led to some good media exposure and various other opportunities opening up. My colleague Jyoti Fernandes (to whom I’m eternally grateful for attending Vallis Veg’s planning appeal hearing and telling it like it is about small scale farming) has just featured on Farming Today and I think acquitted herself brilliantly in the trial-by-soundbite world of the modern media. Not so convinced by the counter-position sketched by Guy Smith of the National Farmer’s Union, who seemed quite happy with arbitrarily guillotining farm subsidies below 5 hectares (apparently on the grounds of efficiency – on which troublesome concept, more on this blog soon…), but not with arbitrarily guillotining them at £150,000. Maybe by parallel logic income tax should only be levied on those earning over, say, £30,000? Smith’s main argument seemed to be that large farms were putting subsidies gainfully to work by employing people. But since it’s widely agreed that small farms are more labour intensive, that, surely, is a fine argument for levelling the playing field in favour of smaller operations?
There’ve been a few negative responses to Jyoti’s interview in the Twitterverse, complaining that she unfairly insinuated that large farms produce unhealthier food. The LWA can easily be positioned as anti-large scale farming in this way – unfortunate, because as I’ve argued many times before on this blog, small-scale farmers have a lot in common with large-scale ones, and the real problems are with the large-scale food system not large-scale farmers as such. But just to follow up on the debate, Grant Walling asks “Could landworkers alliance explain why wheat from a 1000 acre farm is less healthy than wheat from a 100 acre farming business?” Well, I’m not aware that any of us have argued that it is – though I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody growing wheat on the smaller scale was preserving greater biodiversity and using less environmentally damaging methods. Like Martin Wolfe for example. Or John Letts. The larger point, though, is that nationally and globally we’re over-reliant on a handful of not massively healthy cereal and oilseed crops which scale up well to highly mechanised large-farm and large-retail production, whereas smaller scale farms typically produce a wider range of products, including the fruits and vegetables that pretty much everyone agrees we should be eating more of – except that here in the UK we’re importing most of the already inadequate quantities of these foodstuffs that we eat. It’s a disgrace, really – if only there were more small farms to produce them locally. What we need is a demonstration outside DEFRA…
And no jail time?? I must say, I am a tiny bit disappointed. Perhaps you have to set the effigy afire? Maybe next time.
So, on this side of the water the government does in fact limit Ag support payments to very high income folk. And like most projects where a pot of money exists there are some who will try to game the system to claim even more of the pot then many of us feel they aught. So nothing new there.
It appears we now have a scofflaw out in Nevada who thinks it appropriate to let his cattle graze federal lands without paying the appropriate rent. Seems the scoundrel has been at this for 20 years. So now the government wants to put an end to all this but makes a rather imprudent move of sending in armed agents to round up the thief’s cattle. Sort of reverse rustling if you will. There is plenty of bad acting going forth from both sides, but I’m rooting for the government on this one. There are plenty of ranchers in the American west who pay to graze their herds on government lands. This has been done for quite a long time now and the impact to the environment can be fairly estimated. One typically hears more about wolf repatriation being the chief issue for these ranchers. I think some rare turtle has gotten into the press with this more recent issue of the Nevada rent thief.
Nope, no jail time – not even so much as a police officer in attendance! Clearly the policy makers are running scared – expect high level reform of British agricultural policy any time now…
Thanks for the interesting update on Stateside farm intrigues – not all of the terminology was familiar to me. You see my kulak and raise me one scofflaw!